Billed as a development twice the size of Hong Kong Island, the billboard announcing Dubai's mammoth Waterfront project now sags from its frame beside the Sheikh Zayed highway.
Waterfront and its parent company Nakheel are among the most high-profile victims of Dubai's property crash. Local and international investors, bankers and real estate agents have been fretting how Nakheel, the property developer, will meet a series of loan payments due this year and next.
But now a mechanism has taken root allowing the Dubai government-owned company to unwind contracts in certain developments, such as Waterfront, that are unlikely to see the light of day.
A growing secondary market allows investors in deferred or cancelled projects to recoup half of their investments by selling their down payments at a discount to other Nakheel customers. These customers can then plough the full value of these "credit notes", as they are being called, into properties that are expected to be built.
In return for the substantial discount, beneficiaries have to inject cash of about 30 per cent of their next instalment into the developments. Investors in off-plan properties normally pay in fixed instalments. So, from Nakheel's point of view, the consolidation process is bringing in cash in a slow market.
Nakheel, backed by its parent Dubai World, needs to raise $4bn to settle a $3.5bn Islamic bond or sukuk , plus profits, due in December, as well as invoices from contractors and suppliers. Its cash flow challenges do not end with the bond: the company has another $4.4bn of debt maturing through 2012, according to its 2008 financial statements.
Brokers and executives say Dubai Waterfront and Palm Jebel Ali, an offshore island, are the main projects where Nakheel will allow consolidation deals.
Thousands of these devices - Nakheel declines to use the term "credit note" - have been issued since April, as the developer seeks to shrink its $80bn project portfolio and to cut expenditure.
Last year Hossam, who asked that his full name not be used, put down Dh1m ($272,000) on a villa in the Veneto project, which was billed as the most up-market part of the Waterfront. Two months ago Hossam managed to sell his investment on to another investor - but only at a 50 per cent discount.
"I am angry that I lose money, but what am I going to do? Sue the government?" he asks. "At least the notes have created some liquidity, the larger problem lies with the private developers."
Hossam is more troubled by the millions of dirhams he ploughed into a private developer that has gone bust during the recession, leaving his family living hand-to-mouth.
The consolidation deals are helping lubricate the clogged property market in Dubai, where transaction volumes have declined as prices halved since the peak last year.
"It's been a very busy market," says one broker, who declined to be named. Other Dubai real estate developers are also offering similar devices to customers, he says.
Nakheel confirms that it is processing requests to consolidate properties but would not say how many it has approved.
"Investors in projects that have been deferred have the option of consolidation if they own other properties within the Nakheel portfolio," the company said. "The advantage to the investor is that Nakheel is able to hand over property to the owner sooner than it might on a deferred project and help investors reduce their financial exposure."
The consolidation deals show the painful measures the company is taking to secure money.
Last week Nakheel raised more than $170m by selling its stake in Mirvac, an Australian developer. The company's parent, Dubai World, the guarantor of Nakheel's 2009 bond, is looking at other means of raising cash as refinancing looms.
The company this year asked contractors and suppliers to take "haircuts" of about 25-35 per cent on unpaid invoices.
Bankers say Nakheel seems to be losing future profits, but maintain that the reduced cash payments from these consolidation deals cover its current construction costs. "Forget profits, it's all about the balance sheet right now," says one banker.
James, a financial services worker, has opted for the consolidation route and is taking advantage of another investor's financial woes to shave $50,000 off the $800,000 price of an off-plan villa. James has transferred his counterparty's down payment into an instalment on another property, which is due to complete before his original choice.
Before sealing the deal, he climbed over the fence of his new property to check progress. Based on what he saw, he believes the house will be ready next year and so he is willing to take a gamble on the developer meeting its schedule.
"It's good for me, but I feel sorry for the other guy," he says. "The government is not honouring a contract with him."